Saturday, April 17, 2010

Singapore Dream : The Scott Huang Story....

I will write about what has happened to the Singapore Dream later but first read about Scott Huang....and various views of what the Singapore Dream is and how it has evolved. If it is tough for Scott Huang, an Ivy League graduate, ever wonder what it is like for the ordinary Singaporean? What is their Singaporean Dream?

-------------
The Great (unreachable?) S'pore Dream (Straits Times, Insight, 17 April 2010).

IF YOU are compiling a handbook on how to succeed in Singapore, you might be tempted to just cut and paste Mr Scott Huang's story into it.


He studied hard in school, received a prestigious scholarship, attended an American Ivy League university, earned a master's in electrical engineering, and went on to a mid-level job in a large maritime company.

What is supposed to happen next - so goes the Singapore Dream - is that he gets married, owns a car, moves into a condominium, joins a golf club, and settles into a comfortable middle-class life happily ever after.

Yet, as the 30-year-old will testify readily, this age-old formula isn't working like he thought it would.

He intends to marry his fiancee, who works in the media industry, by the end of the year, but that's just about where the wheels start to come off the wagon.

Spiralling prices mean the choice piece of private property he hankers for hangs in the balance. Driving a car of his own has been relegated far down the priority list.

He has now drafted a B-dream just in case the A-dream turns out to be beyond his reach.

'I now have what I call a minimum goal and an ideal goal,' he says. 'The minimum goal is an HDB flat; the ideal goal is a condominium apartment and a car.'

Achieving his ideal goal - which includes an overseas education for his future children - is beginning to sound like an impossible dream.

'It will require major changes in lifestyle. I cannot go out so much and cannot have holidays every year. But I'm trying to stay hopeful,' he says.

Mr Huang's tale of the struggle to achieve the Singapore Dream is one familiar to many young Singaporeans of his cohort: in their mid-20s to mid-30s, tertiary-educated, about to settle down or newly married, on the cusp of life.

An increasingly competitive environment and news of rising car and home prices have led to a feeling that the good life they aspire to is slowly slipping out of reach.

But is that really the case?

After all, the country has encountered such bumps several times in its history and every time, young Singaporeans seem to have emerged with their dreams more or less intact.

In 1996, an impassioned debate took place in Parliament over concerns that the Singapore Dream was dying. Eventually, a basket of measures was uncovered to keep the dream alive, including building executive condominiums to provide affordable condo-style living.

The question now is whether another round of initiatives may be forthcoming to keep the young from losing hope. Or is the current situation just a fleeting feeling of helplessness, a phase, a product of economic cycles?

More pertinently, do the young Singaporeans of today dream the same dream as their parents and grandparents?

Or have they scaled the hierarchy of needs and gone beyond such dreams? Or, given a matured economy with slower growth, should Mr Huang and company scale down their expectations instead?

What is the dream?

ONE early articulation of the Singapore Dream in a 1981 Sunday Times article defined it as: 'A salary of a few thousand dollars a month; enough extra cash to decorate the home with the latest equipment and branded fabrics and furniture; holidays abroad; two children and a promise for the future.'

Sometime in the 1990s, this definition was refined to specify the five Cs - a car, condominium, credit cards, cash, and a country club membership.

Are these dreams still relevant, considering that the country has undergone a complete transformation in the past three decades?

Insight posed this question to a dozen young Singaporeans like Mr Huang, and the answer has largely been, 'Yes'.

Although many responded initially with answers like 'happiness' or 'a good life', the achievement of these goals is predicated on the acquisition of material goods.

Only two stress that the happiness they seek has nothing to do with money.

Mr Colin Lim, who works in the finance industry, feels that it is completely natural for people who have grown up watching their parents get rich to want the same things.

Says the 29-year-old: 'I think any society that is going through a period of economic development would end up dreaming the same things and aspiring to the same material things.'

Indeed, no matter how you attempt to classify it, the Singapore Dream is invariably shoved into a money-lined pigeon hole.

National University of Singapore sociologist Tan Ern Ser is someone who knows a thing or two about the Singapore Dream, having set out to study it in the early 1980s when he did his master's thesis.

He concludes that the Singapore Dream is in many ways similar to its American equivalent in the sense that both have to do with social mobility.

'Essentially, it involves crossing a symbolic public-private divide,' he says, referring to things like housing and transport.

He adds that the Singapore version has not changed much over the years because the Singapore project has not changed either.

'Apart from the project of building a nation populated by people with a strong sense of national identity, the Singapore project aims to create a middle-class society. These two components are best seen as works-in-progress, and likely to remain so for a long time to come,' he says.

Political observer Eugene Tan, a law lecturer at the Singapore Management University, links it to the Government's emphasis on the economy.

'The five Cs are still very much regarded as the benchmark of success, and government policy entrenches the mindset that expanding economic opportunity is critical to the nation, the family and the individual's well-being.'

He adds: 'Societal conditioning and political socialisation mean that the Dream has a powerful effect on Singaporeans' value systems, attitudes, aspirations, and ambitions.'

Many also point to the sort of role models society and the media tend to present here.

Singaporeans invited to schools to give talks tend to be financially successful people in the mainstream, not a stay-at-home mum or an avant-garde artist living in a Little India walk-up.

Of course, it cannot be generalised that young Singaporeans care only about things related to money. Probe further and many list more intangible things, like raising good children or having a good work-life balance, as close seconds on the dream hierarchy.

Says Ms Jamie Lim, 27, who works as a consultant in an accounting firm: 'Raising good children is definitely part of the big picture, but of course, when people think of children, they also have to think of money.'

Then there are some who dance to a different drum beat. Like Miss Li Hanyi, 28, an art director in an advertising agency, who says simply that the thought of being tied to a house, kids and money is 'everything I don't want in life'.

She dreams of a more open society: 'I want the vibrancy of New York but with all the things I like about Singapore.'

Mr Eugene Tan thinks that such dreams will creep slowly into the Singaporean's consciousness but that it will be some time before materialism is usurped: 'The Dream has evolved but the innate vulnerability of our society continues to persist and that heightens the drive towards continuous striving as a hedge against being irrelevant. Being poor carries a heavy social stigma.'
IT MAY not be the most unbiased view, but nearly every young Singaporean interviewed is convinced he is facing a harder struggle and a steeper climb than the preceding generation.

Teacher Ross Nasir, 24, is certainly feeling the strain. She is hopeful that she will one day match the executive maisonette her businessman father bought when he was in his 40s, but it just seems very bleak to her right now. 'Everything seems to be getting inaccessible. It's like striking Toto,' she sighed.

This exaggerated sense of hopelessness is common, even if not completely valid as each generation has to slog to achieve its dreams.

It is true to say, however, that earlier generations generally enjoyed greater social mobility than later ones.

Professor Tan Ern Ser calls the late 1970s and early 1980s the 'golden age of the Singapore Dream'. Since then, he says, the playing field has become more crowded, with more higher-educated middle-class families all jostling to get ahead in the 'mobility game'.

Mr Eugene Tan puts it this way: 'A degree earned a generation or two ago was a passport to a good life but a degree today is no guarantee.'

Indeed, the sort of asset appreciation the older 'lucky generation' enjoyed is mind-boggling to the young professionals of today.

In 1965, half the labour force earned less than $150 per month. By 1985, this had shot up to between $600 and $1,500, an increase by up to 10 times.

An average young professional starting a job today with a $2,000 salary would not dare dream that it will turn into $20,000, no matter how long he works.

The same goes for property. Those who bought HDB flats in the 1960s and 1970s for $10,000 or less would have been able to cash out today at up to $500,000.

Much of this perceived luck can be attributed to the rapid growth Singapore went through in that period. With a mature economy comes slower, productivity-related growth.

For today's young, that simply means good wage increases and asset appreciation cannot be taken for granted.


Says Prof Tan: 'The journey is perceived as becoming somewhat more hazardous, competitive, insecure, and uncertain, brought about by globalisation and economic competition and fluctuations.

'Moreover, even as Singaporeans seek to enhance their assets, those in the sandwiched generation may find themselves having to handle various big-ticket items, such as parents' health-care costs and children's education costs, notwithstanding government subsidies for these items.'

But older Singaporeans point out that this hopelessness is just another phase of life. Everyone, baby boomers included, started out fretting that they would never be able to reach their dreams.

Parents of twenty-somethings speak of how their early days were spent in modest rented flats, slowly saving up to bigger and better things.

And even if the comparisons with baby boomers are cast aside, it may not be all bad news.

Yes, car and home prices may be high now, but this is not the first time they have hit these heights. Just like the economy, the affordability of the Singapore Dream follows the fluctuations of the market.

As Prof Ivan Png, professor of information systems and economics at NUS, puts it: 'Affordability is cyclical. So, yes, one strategy would be to wait until affordability improves. The challenge is to predict the cycle.'

Also, if the experience of the elders are anything to go by, there is always hope.

Keeping the dream alive

IF THE Government's action in 1996 is any guide, it is clearly concerned about keeping the Singapore Dream alive for the young. This is why it is monitoring the public housing market very closely and making sure that prices remain affordable.

Explaining why this is very much an important political issue for the Government, Mr Eugene Tan says: 'Having substantial buy-in of the Singapore Dream is fundamental to the Government's legitimacy, popularity and power. Being able to mould the Dream gives the Government considerable leverage and influence over the lives of the average Singaporean.

'If the Dream loses its standing, then the way of life promoted by the Government will lose its efficacy and effectiveness.'

Dr Gillian Koh of the Institute of Policy Studies, in turn, notes that part of the Government's commitment to help innovation and entrepreneurship flourish is driven by the recognition that those are the only vehicles that can provide the exponential wage increases Singaporeans want.

She says the Government's approach to the dream problem is to make sure that it provides a certain minimum, such as good, affordable housing and health care for the masses.

'It has to draw a line in providing some of the basics as its social compact, a line established at where a relatively large portion of the population can benefit, that is fair, and will not bankrupt the system,' she says.

Ultimately, she stresses, everyone's destiny lies in his or her own hands: 'Even if the public makes the Government promise more, I am sure most people do eventually want to go well beyond that and set higher targets for themselves - to do things where their passions lie and let that pay for itself - today the bus, tomorrow a Ferrari?'


Jeremyau@sph.com.sg

26 comments:

xl said...

""She says the Government's approach to the dream problem is to make sure that it provides a certain minimum, such as good, affordable housing and health care for the masses.""
===================================
Contradictory actions by govt - Enslaving people to 30years mortgage in environment of more hazardous, competitive, insecure & uncertain, brought about by globalisation & economic competition & fluctuations.

People need to keep unnecessary expenses to a minimum in this kind of environment. I'm continually amazed at masses who shop like no tomorrow at malls, IT fairs, change hps like change underwear.

PK said...

Singapore is facing diminishing marginal productivity which means that given a variable factor - human labour which is increasing so much over a fixed factor - land, the output is going to be lesser off. Therefore, the economic returns has decreased has it has spread over a larger share of labour.

To worsen the situation, inflation creeps in to mark up the prices of goods and services.

End game for all, I have since re-adjusted my dream and have decided to persue it elsewhere.

Heng if you are still young lah and go out chiong. Staying here is more of an end game, kam gong to stay put and hope government give you "sweets". Must depend on oneself for economic gains if you really that vain.

Anonymous said...

Want good life must be in the right job lah, Ivy league U notwitstanding. The worst thing as a professional in Singapore now is to be an employee engineer or in IT line. You lose out big time to those cheaper, better, faster foreign talents.

Be an investment banker, stock broker, businessman or better still join the Men-in-White. High pay and recession free.

PK said...

ya lah. Must be in the right profession.

We should also question what it means to be literate. A branch of literacy called functional literacy is tagging economic gains with literacy level but it is losing its ground in modern day economics. This is because should we examine it from the fundamental, it is a developing economy for a country which shall then demand a literate labour force and vice versa.

Right now for Singapore, we have an ever increasing pool of literate labour and yet our economy is not going forward and in fact regressing.

Just dont be so vain. I cannot take it especially when a teacher in the article says she want to live in big house. She should really wake up her idea and go work elsewhere and dont bring her economic repessions ideology to her students....

Anonymous said...

Talk not of SINgapore or dreams by any other names. It is your dream and your dreams cannot be define or dictate by others such as that of your leaders and or educated rascals masquerading as intellectuals and professionals.

The Chinese Beggar Sect knew what living means; they freed themselves of burdens, no possession to take care of, no ideal to talk of except the freedom to live. Of course they had much freedom in comparison to SIN where one could and would be charged for resting at parks, void decks or anywhere which is state-owned. Well, okay:- talking about state-owned, shall i say every Singaporean is state-owned too. National Service, freedoms of movements, speech and what not are all regulated, right???

Everyone must have freedom in ones' dream, without freedom, your dreams are just dreams and for most SINgaporeans; dreams of nightmarish kind.

Me can't define nor make dream on anyones' behalf like our leaders and academics do. All i can say is that never entrust your dreams to others, likewise do not let others define your dreams, FIGHT AND GET THE FREEDOM TO DREAM FIRST.

patriot

Anonymous said...

A common mistake is in assuming that a better future is a given and not something that you need to fight for to maintain.

SG has a government whose preoccupation is to maximise the use of the only resource it has - labour - via various productivity moves.

Productivity improves by creating more for less.

Creating More - more responsibilities, longer working hours.

For Less - lower pay, pittance medical benefits, etc.

Singaporeans are not in the habit of fighting for their dreams (too confrontational). Hence the dream will always remain a dream under a goverment which is committed to importing 3rd world employment conditions (so that we will not price ourselves out) and 1st world living costs (so that we be seen along the likes of world class cities).

Anonymous said...

Dear Lucky

If u had studied US history, you will realise that many of the richest belong to the same generation. Eg Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, and a few other tech billionaires were all born around 1954-56. Same for SG.

Mr Huang should stop living his parents' dream and find his own.

Btw, if you really want your children to have a dream ... then you really need to do more than just blog about social issues in between your jihads.

Anonymous said...

dream serves as a guide not a formula.

But prob is when someone adviced you that this dream is acheivable with a formula.

So when the dreams arent realised by the formula, of course he/she will be pissed.

Common sense, no?

Lim Leng Hiong said...

I think that patriot 12:03 made a keen observation.

There can't be a "Singapore Dream" because "Singapore" is not a person.

Notice that the "Dream" about material assets and status symbols takes centrestage in the article.

Anonymous said...

Actually this problem is currently faced by citizens of many developed countries, except papa made the situation alot worse. I feel that even if we change the government by this coming election, the new government would not be able to improve the situation; however that is not a reason to vote for papa

Anonymous said...

Singapore Dream for ordinary folks today is not to be unemployed at 45, replaced by a cheap foreign worker.

And if they were to get sick when they are old, the dream is for a quick death so that other family members will not be financially burdened.

Anonymous said...

Singapore seems to be following the footsteps of America, where the power and money is concentrated among the few elite. With direct power to influence the media, army, banking and legislative functions of the country. The similarity is uncanny, and the system that is in place is elitism.

Anonymous said...

The ivy league bloke needs to manage his expectations, he should not think of jumping into private properties with his first year's paycheck. The world is a whole lot different from what it used to be, this cant be helped.

Anonymous said...

These Gen Y should just stop comparing against their parent's - the baby boomer's generation or the Gen X before them. The baby boomer invented so many things that improve people's lives which cause the economy to grow at an astounding pace. The Gen X took on the challenge and invented the Internet and mobile communications - this cause another boom and promote economic growth. With economic growth comes asset appreciation - these people are just enjoying the fruits of their creativity and labour. What have the Gen Y done or invented? I'm sure if they can find the next "in" thing or invent new stuff that radically change the world, the economy will continue to grow at a fast pace. But can they? This is a generation who grow up with everything fed to them. So before they demand their property value to go up 10000% just like their parents, they should ask themselves what is their contribution to the world?

Anonymous said...

The problem is that too many young people want NOW what it took their parents YEARS to achieve.

Anyone who thinks he should be able to have it all - private property, car, expensive holidays -after a couple of years working, is obviously a fool.

And if he expects to realise all this by 35 at today's exorbitant prices, he is probably insane.

Anonymous said...

Anon@13:47:

If u had studied US history, you will realise that many of the richest belong to the same generation. Eg Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, and a few other tech billionaires were all born around 1954-56. Same for SG.

What a load of crap. So it's clear that you haven't studied US history. Names like Andrew Carnegie, Henry Ford, John Rockefeller, Cornelius Vanderbilt, etc, are all unbeknownst to you.

Lim Leng Hiong said...

Hmm... so Scott Huang has some personal expectations of the material assets kind.

The mainstream media portrays it as an exemplar of the "Singapore Dream".

So Scott Huang is "Singapore"?

Or 10 out of the 12 people they actually bothered to ask is "Singapore", whereas the other two is not "Singapore"?

A financier, A sociologist, A law professor, An accounting consultant and A teacher is "Singapore", whereas An art director is not "Singapore"?

Who gets to decide these things?

Maybe the mainstream media should continue to churn out articles like this so that Singapore-born Singaporeans who dream differently from Scott Huang and his fellow "Dreamers" will suddenly realize that they are not considered part of "Singapore".

This may make them so very, very dulan that they will turn their dreams into reality.

Anonymous said...

Actually we have that problem here in Australia too, except that it is largely related to housing. I think if you want to make it big, it's relatively easier here in Australia compared to Singapore. But everything else being equal, Gen Y here are finding it hard to afford housing like in SG.

Xtrocious said...

Wah, if that guy who graduated from Ivy League also cannot make it, then how about the rest of us peasants?

The only thing "swiss" about our dreams is the holes...

Anonymous said...

The Singapore Dream. These two words are at odds with each other. Firstly, to have a Dream you need to have Freedom. Under a good dictatorship, Singaporeans think they have Freedom, whereas in reality there is hardly any Freedom. So the Singapore Dream is an impossibility.

Anonymous said...

Well you can "make it" by joining the PAP and sell your soul.

Anonymous said...

The Singapore dream is for foreigners who are here to make the most of their stay.

For Singaporeans, we are now living in nightmare that none of us can wake up from.

Anonymous said...

JP Morgan 1837
Rockfeller 1839
Carnegie 1835

pretty close?

Anonymous said...

Stop blaming baby boomers, gen x or gen y. We are all to be blamed for the system that we support.

The mindset of a typical sinky Chinese is to study hard, get a scholarship or graduate from a good university, then expect a good life, with all the material needs fulfilled and start a hobby on golf too!!

All sinkies can ever think of is getting a goof life via a white collar job. Dun wanna do low class blue collar but skilled job.

Such mindset is the result of the education system here. We all take blam in this. What's so great about scoring good grades for exam o getting into a 'branded' school?

In true 1st world country , a plumber or a construction worker can earn as much as a typical degree holder.

Of course, there is a supporting system in those 1st wold countrries that gives high regards to skilled blue collar work


For those sinkies who still support our so called world class education system. U need a rude awakening! There is really not much talent invovled in typing memos, playing office politics, writing meetin minutes, doing prj mgmt, bla bla bla office kindda work.

It doesn't take a lot of effort to look for cheap office from ASEAN countries to replace local office workers.

Stop having 3rd world mindset.

choonway said...

I'm an engineer, and what anonymous@17/4/10 22:51 said is quite true. There is a serious lack of inventive engineers who are Singaporean. Most of the better students are attracted to careers in finance, accountancy. The very best take scholarships and wind up taking administrative roles in civil service.

Frankly FTs engineers don't fit the bill here. They're here only to follow orders and earn money. The motivation is not there to look at the problems unique to Singapore.

What enabled women's emancipation? It was due to devices such as the rice cooker, the washing machine, the vacuum cleaner. If the cost of human labour is cheaper than the devices and the electricity to run it, would we have invented them?

If maids could so easily be hired would we ever develop an alternative to the remaining chores such as ironing clothes, general cleaning, cooking etc?

If we go the cheap labour route we will forever have a living standard comparable to wherever we get our cheap labour from.

Think about this.

qinbincai123 said...

The world puts off its mask of jired88 vastness to its lover.
It becomes small as one song, as one kiss of the eternal.
Cheap New Era Hats

New Era Fitted Hats

Wholesale Cheap Hats

Wholesale New Era Hats

Cheap 59fifty Hats