Thursday, May 05, 2011

CNBC : Singapore's Fast Growth Creating Rich-Poor Divide?

This article from CNBC is worth a read. It describes the trade-off between Singapore's pursuit of GDP growth and the income gap. People are poor and struggling not because of globalisation or their lack of willingness to work hard - people are suffering because we have a govt that puts GDP growth above other things like quality of life and social equity. I have hightlighted the more interesting parts.
-------------------
Singapore's Fast Growth Creating Rich-Poor Divide?


Published: Wednesday, 4 May 2011
9:53 PM ET Text Size By: Jenny Chan Vheng Yern

CNBC Asia Pacific


Liyana Dhamirah, 24, her husband Fazli bin Mohd Jailani, 31, and their three young children lived in a tent on the beach in Singapore for four months in 2009 when their Housing Development Board flat was repossessed as they were unable to service their mortgage loan.
Household incomes in Singapore have grown only 21% in the past decade, compared to real GDP growth of 72% in the same period.


The Singapore government provides subsidized housing via the Board to its citizens. Liyana and Fazli now share a rented flat with another family.

"It's unfair. I'm a Singaporean, yet I'm not benefiting at all from how rich Singapore has become."

Liyana and Fazli earn a combined S$800 ($652) a month but have been unable to make ends meet. "Sometimes I can't even afford a S$1 ($0.80) ice cream cone for my kids," says Fazli, a former mechanic apprentice, who is now unemployed and depends on the income from his wife's online handmade trinkets business.

Singapore, which goes to the polls on Saturday, reported sterling growth in the first quarter of this year. The economy expanded 23.5 percent quarter on quarter and 8.5 percent over the previous year. This was on the back of an unprecedented growth of almost 15 percent in 2010.

But not everyone in this island nation of 5 million people is celebrating. Irvin Seah, an economist at Singapore bank DBS says, "Plainly, not everyone has benefited equally from the economic growth that has occurred over the past decade."

Median household incomes have grown only 21 percent in the past decade, compared to real GDP growth of 72 percent in the same period, according to government statistics.


In 2010 when GDP expanded by 14.5 percent, household incomes rose on average just 0.3 percent after adjusting for inflation.


"In any capitalist society where profit maximization is key, this gap will widen unless we get heavy government intervention.”  - Song Seng Wun Economist, CIMB-GK Researcg

Take the case of Rokiah Ahmad, 46, a librarian at the Singapore Department of Statistics. Her salary was S$1,500 ($1,222) per month 10 years ago, and after a decade of small increments, it's now S$1,700 ($1,385) a month.
"It's not enough to raise three daughters and one son. We have financial difficulties."

Chow Penn Nee, an economist at United Overseas Bank says, "Wage growth is clearly not keeping up with GDP growth and the divide between the rich and the poor is getting bigger."

Asked for the government's response, Singapore's Minister for Manpower, Gan Kim Yong said income growth cannot be equated with GDP growth, "as the former is also influenced by other demand and supply factors."

The opposition Workers' Party candidate, Chen Show Mao, who was a corporate lawyer before he joined the largest opposition party in Singapore, said during the party's election rally that the benefit of Singapore's economic growth "went to corporate profits and the wages of top earners".

Government data showed that last year the bottom 10 percent of the population had a household monthly income of S$1,400 ($1,141) compared with S$23,684 ($19,308) for households in the top 10 percent.

Singapore has the highest concentration of millionaires in the world. According to the Boston Consulting Group's Global Wealth 2010 Report, 11.4 percent of Singapore’s population is millionaires.

Prime Minster and the Secretary General of the People's Action Party, Lee Hsien Loong, leads a cheer together with the party members during a rally on May 3, 2011 in Singapore.
And it has the second highest income gap among 42 nations “with very highuman development,” according to the United Nations. Singapore's Gini coefficient, a measure of income inequality where zero is complete equality and one maximum inequality, was 0.472 in 2010.

CIMB-GK Research economist Song Seng Wun believes that growth itself partly explains the widening income gap. "In any capitalist society where profit maximization is key, this gap will widen unless we get heavy government intervention."

According to Leif Eskesen, HSBC's chief economist for India & ASEAN, some inequality is integral to the effective functioning of a market economy, "but too much inequality could also hurt growth."

When contacted, Singapore's Ministry of Finance cited the recent budget in which the government promised to raise the productivity of Singaporeans via training and other benefits.

In its budget in February, the government handed out one-time benefits valued at S$3.2 billion ($2.6 billion) targeting lower-income citizens. The ruling People's Action Party has also promised larger bursaries and grants in its manifesto.

OSK-DMG economist Enrico Tanuwidjaja says these handouts can only cushion the impact of inflation temporarily since they are one-offs. “Purchasing power actually stays the same.”

Liyana and Fazli say since 90 percent of their wages are used to pay bills, the extra money ensures that they don't fall behind in arrears too much. "It's only enough for survival."


Current DateTime: 06:45:39 04 May 2011

LinksList Documentid: 42892533

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

what stopping fazli from working, is he sick? he seems fine and lazy. i dont pity these people, why need so much kid when you dont have enough, priority is the key word. get a job then get house then reproduce, common sense. And still want to blame govt =( am sick of these kind of ppl and am malay like them and i am fine

sonof singapore said...

Dear sir, can you kindly put up this video on your blog:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-XI4FdV6zM

It is a touching video paying tribute to the oppositions

Anonymous said...

I don't technically think it's easy to just lay the blame on the Malay guy for being "lazy". That would be internalizing the stereotype about Malays being lazy when it is not true at all often. He could be sick, laid-off or unable to find a job after retrenchment, namely in the case of technical workers who cannot re-apply their knowledge again to a similar field. I am not sure though that the incumbent PAP when in government has even bothered to care whether its citizens share wealth and growth equally. It probably was not their emphasis or focus, although they drum it into everyone that they would "leave no Singaporean behind", and huge corporate growth is probably their true focus. Singaporeans do indeed get left behind when they do not actually advance along with the pressures of life such as inflation and risings costs, alongside stagnant wages. Those handouts are actually taxpayers' money and they only basically give it out as candies around GE period. It is such a telling sign.

Anonymous said...

Anon @ 5/5/11 11:15,
What Anon @ 5/5/11 16:23 is true indeed. It could be circumstances. Wait till your loved ones are in the same predicament. Think with head not with dick, prick!

Anonymous said...

to anon 1906,
whatever the circumstances, you cant blame others for your own lacking, i cant accept it unless he is terminally sick, he have 3 kids and that is not enough for a reason to beg for job whatever the pay whatever it is? 70 years old can still work at McD! He is clearly thinking with his dick and some people here

Anonymous said...

Hey I will vote for opposition.

But that is truly a poor example.

Anonymous said...

there could be many reasons why he is not working. so lets stop dissing the guy like as if you know what his circumstances are.and please do not use the usual PAPy argument of meritocracy and one is to blame if he doesnt do well in life. look, there is no such thing as perfect meritocracy. the PAPies have used it to brainwash all singaporeans to work their asses off to enrich state coffers and enrich the PAPies. Wahai, dear Singaporeans, when will you wake up??